Straight AheadThe major Christian denominations are preparing to issue a "social creed for the 21st century" and to celebrate the original "social creed: for the churches as they commemorate the founding, in 1908, of the Federal Council of Churches, now known as the National Council of Churches. Additionally, the stated clerk of the PC(USA), Clifton Kirkpatrick, joined ten other religious leaders in October to call on Congress to raise the federal minimum wage. They said that it was a matter of economic justice. Again, we see the mainline churches engaged in their social obsession.
Involvement in social issues by the churches is not new, of course. The difference today is that religious leaders seem to think it's their responsibility to speak out on every social issue. The leaders of mainline denominations usually take the liberal side. The leaders of evangelical or more theologically conservative religious groups generally take the more conservative political stance. The liberals seem to be the most hypocritical, though, since they criticize the conservative evangelicals not only for their conservative stance, but for taking such an active role in the political process. That's a very strange criticism, since the liberal wing of Protestantism has been doing the same thing for at least 50 years.
When will the religious leaders from all across the theological spectrum realize that the power of the church comes from the Holy Spirit, not from a secular spirit of politics? When will we remember that our true vitality comes when we are involved in the mission of bringing people to faith in Christ, not the mission of dubious material gains?
Increasingly, it seems that when churches talk about their outreach and missions projects, the emphasis is almost totally social and material, not spiritual and eternal. Have done, O church, with this social obsession!
4 Comments:
At 11/04/2006 09:22:00 AM , Anonymous said...
Don't you care at all about people who are struggling? Just because you've got no big problems in this area to contend with, (after all, you are taken care of by your church, right?), there are many others who wonder how they will make ends meet. But you wouldn't know about that, having had the luxury of a great education, and probably parents who doted on you, and most likely still do. If you got into financial trouble, you could likely hit them up for a loan, or find some kind of employment. It never ceases to amaze me how people like you are so snobbish when it comes to people who have not had your advantages. You have a huge ego. Your entries show that loud and clear. You think you know so much, living in your little coccoon, in your little part of the world, spouting off all kinds of self-important sounding things. You want so much to impress us out here in cyberland, but you are really full of it.
At 11/04/2006 09:52:00 AM , Daniel Berry said...
Well, hey, at least, he's reading this! I allowed the comment to be published, even though none of the assumptions made are true. The issue, in any case, is not whether I care about the plight of the less fortunate, but whether or not the church should be pre-occupied with social concerns instead of the affairs of eternal significance.
At 11/04/2006 10:29:00 PM , The None Zone said...
Jesus calls us to do both, actually. We are to be spiritual leaders AND we are to give a drink of water and food to those who need it---with no strings attached. The thing that really bothered me during seminary is that some of us were called upon to go preach to the poor--only after they heard our sermon could they eat the food in the shelter. I saw that as pure manipulation.
At 11/04/2006 10:37:00 PM , The None Zone said...
FYI Anonymous:
Compared to people in other countries, most of whom do not have computers, even you are rich. And who are you to judge??
And, if we are paying our taxes, we are contributing to the poor. Course I know a few who have not paid their taxes for several years.
Post a Comment
<< Home