Straight Ahead

Thoughts of a conservative, Southern Presbyterian minister who also happens to be totally blind, with comments about theology--and everything else, too, from sports and the South to politics and favorite food. Anyone can comment.

Saturday, October 07, 2006

Hebrews 6:4-6:

Hebrews 6:4-6: "For it is in;possible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, and have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, if they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put Him to an open shame."
 
Someone recently asked me what this passage means.  I decided that I will put my response on this blog, since I haven't put an entry here for a couple of days, and since we recently discussed another passage in Hebrews in connection with this week's lectionary reading.  People generally get into difficulty on this passage in one of two ways.
 
Some people think that perhaps the passage means that if they sin as a Christian, especially if that sin is willful and in full awareness of the wrongdoing, salvation might be lost, and they might be in peril of their eternal life.  This fear seems to come more often from those who were raised with a concept of God that was very frightening and terrible.  It is clear, however, when we read the body of Scripture both in the Old and New Testament that this cannot possibly be the interpretation.  The sins of King David are well-known.  The apostle Paul confesses his own sins and shortcomings in various passages of the epistles, particularly in Romans 7.  And a reading of 1 John will confirm that, while a Christian certainly is not permitted to sin habitually, none of us is without sin.  The "falling away" referred to in these verses of Hebrews 6 does not refer simply to committing sin, but to a denial of Christ, a rejection of the Christian truth.
 
But this brings us to the second and more common and more difficult misinterpretation of the passage.  What about a person who makes their profession of faith in Christ and then denies the teachings of the faith.  Can that person not be recovered? Do we not teach the final perseverance of the saints, or the doctrine commonly referred to as "eternal security?"
 
I certainly do teach and believe in the doctrine of the perseverance, or, as R. C. Sproul refers to it, the "preservation" of the saints.  I do affirm eternal security.  I believe that there are many who go forward at a crusade or make professions of faith, and give the appearance of receiving Jesus Christ, who get caught up in an emotional experience, and then deny or leave the faith.  It's not unlike the seed that were sown on the various types of soil, with varying results.  There are people who get a taste of being part of the body of Christ, who have a subjective experience, but who never truly acknowledge Jesus Christ as the Lord and Saviour, the Way, the Truth, and the Life, the only Mediator between God and man, and the Son of God.  They never really affirm what the Scriptures teach about God and Christ.
 
Another way to express what I'm saying would be this:  It is impossible for a person who truly receives the Holy Spirit and is adopted into the household of faith, ever to fall away.  Their sins are already forgiven.  They are already acquitted of all charges against them for all eternity.  God does not change His mind.  He will preserve His elect to the very end.  So if a person who once seemed to be in Christ should fall away and renounce Jesus or reject the sacrifice of Christ on the cross, that person was never really a Christian to begin with. God will not lose any who truly belong to Him through Jesus Christ.  On this point, the Scriptures of the New Testament seem clear, and the Scriptures of the Old Testament give us illustrative foundational truth.  Romans 8-11, along with many other Scriptures, are helpful in this area.  I think also of Ephesians 1.  It is very important to observe one of the primary principles of reformed Scriptural interpretation--namely, to let Scripture interpret Scripture.
  
 
 

4 Comments:

  • At 10/08/2006 11:56:00 PM , Blogger Falantedios said...

    Dear Brother Daniel,

    Thank you for your diligence in exegeting this passage. I agree with you about the two major difficulties in interpreting this passage, but I find your solution unconvincing for two reasons.

    One: it tends to render the Christian life insignificant, doesn't it? If NOTHING I do post-confession can affect my destiny? In Luke 15, the father did not deliver the feast to the prodigal while he was in the far country; he did not take a leg of lamb out to the elder brother either.

    Two: it merely shifts the confusion over who is saved and who is not. The question merely changes from "Have I fallen away?" to "Did I truly believe?" without providing a satisfactory answer to either.

    That's just my opinion. My current solution to the dilemma that arises from this verse has to do with the phrase, "have tasted... the powers of the world to come..."
    I believe that the Hebrew preacher might be making a point about a clearly visible subset of believers with whom the first century Hebrew Christians would be very familiar: those believers entrusted with 'powers of the world to come', i.e. visible gifts of the Spirit. Prophecy, healing, and tongues are the three that come most quickly to mind.

    However, it is difficult for me to reject the notion that 'spiritual apathy leads to apostasy,' since that seems to be the literary context (5:11-6:3) out of which this warning about the impossibility of restoration grows.

    If one was never really a Christian, Daniel, then they were never enlightened. They never tasted the heavenly gift. They certainly never partook of the Holy Ghost. What would there be to restore?

    in HIS love,
    Nick Gill
    Frankfort, KY

    http://fumblingtowardseternity.blogspot.com

     
  • At 10/09/2006 07:22:00 PM , Blogger rena said...

    I truly appreciated this. Now I wish I could get my husband to read it. He is living like aa "prodigal" right now. He confessed Christ as His Savior and Lord when he was about 8, was raised up in the faith, served as a youth leader, walked close to God (or so it seemed) I've read some of his bible studies from back then and it certainly appeared that he had a clear understanding and belief of God and His plan for redemption. Then, when he was about 25ish, he just stopped going to church...he tells me that he believes in God, but that God made the world and then backed off..we're all really on our own and He is not involved in our daily lives. He does not believe that one can have a close, personal and intimate relationship with God through His Son. When I talk to him about his once close relationship with Christ, he quotes this very passage from Hebrews and tells me that I'm fooling myself if I think that I've been forgiven and accepted again. (I was prodigal for 15 years and returned to the Lord in 1998)
    I believe that the prodigal son is an illustration of a believer who is "prone to wander" and who gives up his attempts to live life his way and finally surrenders, returning to the Father's house...and that it illustrates what God's heart is like when we who believe "wander" away, only to return...but what would have become of the prodigal had he perished in the foreign land?
    Your thoughts on this question would be most appreciated.

    Also, when reading Hebrews in context that it was written to Jewish believers, I believe that this passage is talking about those believers who returned to the Jewish Law and system of sacrifices, after tasting grace...this talks of true "stop believing" apostates.

    As usual, great stuff. I you wish to reply to me personally,my private email is rnovotny@telus.net

     
  • At 10/17/2006 04:07:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

    Thanks Daniel for your good insights, and I appreciate how you wrestle with the text and seek to interpret Scripture with Scripture and bring out good stuff brother!

    One aspect of the context is the human dynamic of those who are immature in the faith in contrast with those who "have the powers of discernment trained by constant practice to dinstinguish good from evil" (Heb. 5:14). The writer pushes them and us to greater discernment of what is truly of God and what gives the appearance of godliness.

    It seems that Hebrews 6:1-3 gives us a few examples of what it means to "taste" or have exposure to the gospel and the means of grace and insights of basic doctrines. This includes physical evidences of religion and some knowledge of Christian experience. The writer affirms that his audience has the rudimentary evidence of a life embraced by Christ. He pushes them toward discernment, to know that not everyone who has experienced the external evidences or has made some profession of faith in doctrinal truths is truly regenerate. There are evidences throughout the OT and NT that many had physical manifestations of faith, but in the end were found apostate (Saul, Esau, Judas, Demas). Jesus' own prophecy takes us there: "On that day many will say to me, 'Lord, Lord, did we no prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?" And then will I declare to them, I never knew you; depart from me, your workers of lawlessness" (Matthew 7:22,23).

    The writer of Hebrews is continuously bringing exhortation followed by encouragement. He does it again. Not everyone who who embraces Christian religion has been embraced by Jesus through the Holy Spirit(exhortation). Thankfully, he writes further: "yet in your case, beloved, we feel sure of better things -- things that belong to salvation" (Heb. 6:9)(encouragement!).

    We must be discerning of these realities in our day, and I think your blogs help us in that way brother Daniel. We must be of those "who have their powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil" (Hebrews 5:14). We need more than just enlightenment; we need what the pastors/theologians of old called "experimental religion." Lord help us. Lord help me!
    Your Friend,
    Tank

     
  • At 11/01/2006 10:34:00 PM , Anonymous Anonymous said...

    An important thing to remember when reading this scripture about falling away and it being impossible to be renewed to repentence is that the author is talking about repentence. Jesus will not cast out anyone who comes to him. Therefore if you repent then this means that you have not truly fallen away as described in this passage.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home