Often, in the midst of a church controversy, someone will say, "I'm tired of the fighting. Let's try something else." At another gathering, people will be talking about an ongoing debate in Congress or the crisis in the Middle East, and someone will say, "Why can't we all just get along?" I get almost as weary of hearing these kinds of comments as those people get of the discussions themselves! I'm tired of compromise which leads to capitulation, and an insipid attitude that leads to love of superficial peace over love of truth and conviction born of principle.
The problem is that to be a good citizen or churchman requires vigilance. At times, of course, compromise is wise. It isn't worth splitting the church over the color of the carpet or the volume of the organ, or even the temperature in the sanctuary! Those are hardly issues of principle or theological significance. When we say, however, that we're "tired of the fight," or we wonder "why can't we all just get along," we are betraying a basic misunderstanding of what it means to be a Christian or even an involved citizen in a republic.
We can influence the church, the nation, or the society in positive ways, but only if we are willing to pay the price. Of course, we can just remain pre-occupied with our own affairs, self-absorbed and contained in our own little world; but that is really not only a selfish but a short-sighted approach to life. Do we not want a better country, a more faithful church, a great heritage to pass down to our children and grandchildren? Do we not want those who come after us to enjoy some of the same privileges and freedoms and learn of the same faith that nurtured and sustained us? For that matter, do we not desire that even in our own lifetime, the church and the country and the culture that we've known will still exist--strong and true?
Sometimes, church people talk as though if only this one battle can be won, then they can get back to the real mission of the church. But as someone pointed out at a conference I attended several years ago, maintaining the integrity of the message of Christianity, holding on to the landmarks of the church, is part of the real mission of the church. The battle goes on. The faithful disciple can never rest. Those who desire to take away these truths and undermine Christ and His church do not give up. They never say, "I'm tired of the fight." They are never willing to "try something different" just to gain a temporary cease-fire! To be "reformed, always reforming" in the light of Scripture demands constant vigilance. Faithfulness never comes easy.
In the same way, to be a responsible citizen means knowing and confronting the issues, voting with forethought, engaging those around us and seeing the "big picture" and the higher principles that go beyond temporary convenience. Ideas have power. Words have meaning. Decisions have consequences.
I've always been drawn to the struggle. I enjoy Parliamentary procedure because it is the most orderly way to ensure fair debate and open discussion. How can we, as Christians or as American patriots, afford to shy away from hard realities just so we won't be bothered by the difficult task of thinking? This does not mean that we always have to adopt a style that is personally confrontational or nasty. Neither does it mean, however, that we allow the world to think we're asleep or apathetic. When outrageous events occur or hideous ideas are expressed, we are willing to call evil by its right name. We know that faithful discipleship and civic responsibility are ongoing and are often connected. The church cannot afford the luxury of experimenting with false unity based on dubious principles; and our culture cannot afford the luxury of those who would sacrifice western civilization for their own short-lived personal security or convenience. Truly, the battle goes on.
8 Comments:
At 8/12/2006 12:17:00 PM , Anonymous said...
Brilliantly stated, Daniel. See what we would miss if you were Commissioner of Baseball? Seriously, your point is well taken and well expressed. If you don't stand for something then you will fall for anything. Partisanship is the backbone of freedom, true spirituality and real intellectual endeavor.
At 8/12/2006 01:10:00 PM , sweetmagnolia said...
Churches should not compromise when it comes to the essentials of Christian doctrines as outlined in the Nicene Creed which is the oldest datable Christian creed. I once joined some Christian online group. Their only criteria for identifying oneself as a Christian was the Nicene Creed. If you couldn't agree with that creed, then you had to click on the category of "other." Mormons, Christian Scientists, Jehovah Witnesses, and United Pentecostal were a few such groups which were already designated as outside standard Christianity.
We should also not compromise when it comes to basic standards of morality which do not change with the rotation of the calendar.
However, I have also seen churches get sidelined on peripheral issues that don't amount to a proverbial "hill of beans." My pastor told me that the worst fight he has ever encountered in another church was over the issue of what to do about a little boy who constantly picked his nose in church. That would be laughable if it weren't so pathetic.
At 8/12/2006 02:18:00 PM , Anonymous said...
Daniel, i think you made some very profound statements. We have to take a stand for what we believe in. There are too many pacifist in the world who , as the name implies, do nothing, then complain constantly. I have no tolerance for non voters who complain about our government. I complain about it myself, but i also vote! Thanks for you commments, Kelli
At 8/12/2006 08:59:00 PM , JH Fischer said...
Ed Durham told me of your blog, and your ministry. Nicely put, Daniel. I can't help but wonder if you resonate with the works of Marva Dawn or Carl Braaten, both favorites of mine.
Peace,
JH Fischer
At 8/12/2006 09:21:00 PM , The None Zone said...
Yes, he knows about Marva Dawn and recommended reading her thoughts to me.
As a pastor once preached from the pulpit, true faith is made up of struggle. We struggle when we fight for what we believe to be right. Neither pacifism nor fighting just because you can make any sense.
At 8/12/2006 10:08:00 PM , Daniel Berry said...
She's right. I know Marva Dawn's work and respect it greatly. Even got the chance to talk to her on the phone once. I'd like to say I told her something really profound; but I was so taken aback, I hardly knew what to say.
At 8/13/2006 05:42:00 PM , Anonymous said...
If Presbyterians were being attacked from the outside by anti-Christian forces, I doubt there would be much in the way of apathy among the membership.
When Presbyterians are being attacked by anti-Christian forces from within, apathy among the membership is the modus operandi.
One reason for the apathy is that members are gun shy about challenging a fellow member in their church.
At 8/13/2006 07:27:00 PM , Daniel Berry said...
I think Larry is probably right, provided that the Presbyterians understood when they are actually being attacked by anti-Christians forces! I'm not always sure they know an anti-Christian when they see one! And I'd sure like to know who you are LJMSB52. Apparently, you know me, by the tone of your comment. Please email me and let me in on your secret identity! (Grin.)
Post a Comment
<< Home